Carotid Near-Occlusion ('String Sign'): Differential Diagnosis with 99% Stenosis and Occlusion in Duplex Scanning — МЕДТРЕЙН Asia
Angiology

Carotid Near-Occlusion ('String Sign'): Differential Diagnosis with 99% Stenosis and Occlusion in Duplex Scanning

Briefly. Carotid near-occlusion (pre-occlusive stenosis, 'string sign') is a critical narrowing of the ICA with minimal residual flow appearing as a thin, slow stream. It is easily mistaken for occlusion, where the signal in the lumen is absent. The key to differentiation is sensitive modes (power/microvascular Doppler, low scale) and reliance on a combination of signs rather than a single PSV.

Definition and Terminology

Subtotal (pre-occlusive) stenosis is referred to as the 'string sign' or 'string symptom'. According to the guidelines by B.V. Blagodir (2026), this condition is characterized by minimal residual flow — a thin, slow stream with very low velocity. International terminology uses the term carotid near-occlusion (Johansson, Fox, 2016; Johansson, Gu, Fox, 2022 — cited in ESVS 2023).

Three Conditions to Differentiate

SignSevere Stenosis (99%)Near-Occlusion ('String')Occlusion
Signal in the LumenPresent, locally increased velocitiesThin slow stream with very low velocityAbsent with adequate settings
PSVLocally sharply increased proportional to narrowingVery low ('low velocity')Not determined
Additional FindingsPost-stenotic turbulence, tardus-parvus distalRequires power/microvascular Doppler, low scaleStump/thump flow proximally, collaterals

Why Near-Occlusion is Mistaken for Occlusion

In pronounced near-occlusion, the residual flow is so scant that with standard settings, the color signal is not registered, creating a false picture of occlusion. Rule 3 (Blagodir, 2026): 'low velocity' with visible severe plaque is not a reason to write 'normal' or 'occlusion'; it may be near-occlusion. Confirm residual flow with sensitive modes and rely on a combination of signs.

Practical Techniques for Differentiation

To detect minimal flow, use power/microvascular Doppler and a low scale. In true occlusion, there is no color or spectral signal in the lumen with adequate settings; proximally, a stump/thump flow — a short high-resistance signal at the entrance to the closed segment — may be registered; collaterals are often involved. The degree of narrowing cannot be determined by grayscale imaging, and anechoic plaques may not be visualized.

Limitations of Velocity Criteria

SRU/IAC thresholds are derived for short focal stenoses and fail with different geometry. Extensive and tandem stenoses are a special case for velocity criteria; this is one of the recognized pitfalls in carotid duplex interpretation (Gunabushanam et al., 2023). In near-occlusion, velocity criteria are particularly unreliable because the collapse of the lumen distal to the narrowing reduces velocity despite the degree of stenosis.

Significance of ECA and Collaterals

The external carotid artery is always described (IAC/SRU standards). In ICA or CCA occlusion, the ECA becomes the key collateral to the brain through the ophthalmic anastomosis. For reliable identification of the ICA and ECA, the tapping test on the superficial temporal artery is used: rhythmic oscillations ('saw teeth') appear in the ECA, while the ICA does not respond to tapping.

Frequently asked questions

How to distinguish near-occlusion from complete occlusion?

In occlusion, there is no color or spectral signal in the lumen with adequate settings. In near-occlusion, a thin slow stream with very low velocity is preserved, detectable by power/microvascular Doppler and a low scale.

Can PSV be relied upon in near-occlusion?

No. In near-occlusion, the velocity is 'low', which contradicts what is expected in severe stenosis. Rely on a combination of signs rather than a single PSV; suspect near-occlusion with visible severe plaque and low velocity.

What sign confirms true occlusion proximal to the closed segment?

Stump/thump flow — a short high-resistance signal at the entrance to the closed segment; collaterals are often also involved.

Why are standard velocity thresholds unreliable in near-occlusion?

SRU/IAC thresholds are derived for short focal stenoses. In extensive, tandem stenoses and collapse of the distal lumen, they fail — a recognized pitfall in interpretation (Gunabushanam et al., 2023).

What modes are needed to detect residual flow?

Power/microvascular Doppler and a low scale — they allow registration of the minimal stream that standard color mapping settings miss.

The material is intended for specialists and does not replace clinical judgment. Threshold values are periodically reviewed — refer to the current edition of the applicable consensus.
Sources: Ultrasound Examination of Vessels: A Modern Practical Guide (B.V. Blagodir, 2026); Diagnostic Ultrasound Vascular 2nd Edition, 2025; Diagnostic Medical Sonography: The Vascular System, 3rd Edition, 2023; ESVS 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines (Naylor R. et al., 2023) citing Johansson & Fox 2016, Johansson, Gu & Fox 2022; Gunabushanam et al., 2023 (cited)
View specialty courses: Angiology →
Спросить Alex Отвечу на любой вопрос · 24/7 · на любом языке