Thyroid Nodule in a Child: Applicability of ACR TI-RADS and ATA Recommendations (Pediatrics) — МЕДТРЕЙН Asia
Ultrasound Diagnostics in Pediatrics

Thyroid Nodule in a Child: Applicability of ACR TI-RADS and ATA Recommendations (Pediatrics)

Briefly. Pediatric-specific thresholds for ACR TI-RADS are absent in the provided source fragments; specialized recommendations for nodule management and differentiated thyroid cancer in children are referenced (Francis GL, Waguespack SG, Bauer AJ, et al. Thyroid 2015). Direct numerical criteria for ACR TI-RADS/ATA applicability to pediatric populations are not provided in the available materials [verification needed].

What is Available in the Fragments

The provided sources do not include directly adapted pediatric thresholds for ACR TI-RADS or pediatric-specific ATA criteria. A specialized publication on management of thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer in children is cited: Francis GL, Waguespack SG, Bauer AJ, et al. Management guidelines for children with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2015; 25:716-759. Specific pediatric thresholds from this publication are not cited in the fragments [verification needed].

Ultrasound Features Underlying TI-RADS Systems

According to the consensus materials, the set of suspicious features that formed the basis of ACR/EU-TIRADS includes: solidity, hypoechogenicity/marked hypoechogenicity, irregular/indistinct margins, microcalcifications, and taller-than-wide shape.

Regarding Categories with Subcategories 4a/4b (Kwak TI-RADS)

Conclusions such as "TI-RADS 4A" refer to the Kwak TI-RADS classification, not ACR TI-RADS or EU-TIRADS, which do not have subcategories 4a/4b. Kwak categories according to the fragments:

CategoryInterpretationMalignancy Risk
1Normal thyroid
2Benign nodule~0%
3Probably benign<5%
4aLow suspicion, 1 suspicious feature~5–10%
4bIntermediate suspicion, 2 features~10–50%
4cHigh suspicion, 3–4 features~50–85%
5All 5 features>85%
6Cytologically/histologically confirmed malignancy

Clinical Conclusion

For pediatric patients, the available materials reference separate recommendations for nodule management and differentiated thyroid cancer in children (Francis et al., Thyroid 2015); specific pediatric thresholds for ACR TI-RADS and ATA are not presented in the fragments and require verification from primary sources [verification needed].

Frequently asked questions

Are there subcategories 4a/4b in ACR TI-RADS?

No. Subcategories 4a/4b/4c belong to the Kwak TI-RADS classification; such subcategories do not exist in ACR TI-RADS or EU-TIRADS.

Which ultrasound features are considered suspicious?

Solidity, hypoechogenicity/marked hypoechogenicity, irregular/indistinct margins, microcalcifications, and taller-than-wide shape.

Are there separate recommendations for thyroid nodules in children?

Yes, the fragments cite the publication by Francis GL, Waguespack SG, Bauer AJ, et al. on management of nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer in children (Thyroid 2015; 25:716-759).

Are pediatric thresholds for ACR TI-RADS/ATA provided in the fragments?

No, specific numerical pediatric criteria are not provided in the available materials [verification needed].

What is the malignancy risk for category 4a according to Kwak classification?

According to the fragments—low suspicion (1 feature), with malignancy risk approximately 5–10%.

The material is intended for specialists and does not replace clinical judgment. Threshold values are periodically reviewed — refer to the current edition of the applicable consensus.
Sources: Verified answers from the Medtrain expert consensus, 2026; AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance and Interpretation of Diagnostic Ultrasound of the Thyroid and Extracranial Head and Neck, 2023 (citing Francis GL et al. Thyroid 2015; 25:716-759; Tessler FN et al. ACR TI-RADS, J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14:587-593).
View specialty courses: Pediatric Ultrasound →
Спросить Alex Отвечу на любой вопрос · 24/7 · на любом языке