Decidualized Endometrioma During Pregnancy: An O-RADS Pitfall — МЕДТРЕЙН Asia
Obstetrics and Gynecology

Decidualized Endometrioma During Pregnancy: An O-RADS Pitfall

Briefly. Decidualized endometrioma is an important diagnostic pitfall during pregnancy: under the influence of gestational hormones, papillary projections with vascularization develop within the endometrioma, mimicking malignancy and leading to unnecessary surgical removal. It is important for clinicians to recognize this benign phenomenon to avoid excessive intervention during pregnancy.

Essence of the Phenomenon

Decidualization of endometrioid foci during pregnancy leads to the appearance of papillary structures within the endometrioma, which on ultrasound examination may be suspicious for malignant transformation. This process has been described both for ovarian endometriomas and for extragonadal endometriosis foci (e.g., bladder involvement), mimicking neoplastic processes (Lambrechts S, et al.; Chertin B, et al.).

Ultrasound Findings

According to series describing ovarian masses with papillary projections diagnosed and removed during pregnancy, decidualized endometrioma is characterized by papillary projections that may be accompanied by vascularization and create sonographic features suspicious for malignancy (Fruscella E, et al.; Mascilini F, et al.). Features more suggestive of benign decidualization are smooth contour of papillary projections and characteristic "ground glass" (low-level) cyst contents: according to series, smooth contour of papillary projections (≈79% versus 27%) and ground-glass echogenicity (≈74% versus 13%) in benign masses are more frequent than in malignant lesions (Mascilini F et al., 2014). Papillary projections in decidualization are typically vascularized on color or power Doppler; therefore, the mere presence of blood flow does NOT exclude a benign process—herein lies the pitfall. Features supporting decidualization include known prepregnancy endometrioma, smooth or lobulated solid nodules, and stability on follow-up ultrasound (absence of significant growth), whereas in malignant processes the solid component more often has an irregular contour. Because of substantial morphologic overlap, definitive differentiation often requires consideration of clinical history, dynamic changes, and, when necessary, MRI.

Clinical Significance and O-RADS Pitfall

The main problem is excessive suspicion and unjustified surgical removal of masses during pregnancy. Studies including clinical and ultrasound characteristics of decidualized endometriomas surgically removed during pregnancy emphasize the discrepancy between alarming sonographic appearance and benign histology (Mascilini F, et al., Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:354-360).

Natural Evolution During Pregnancy

The morphology of deep endometriosis and ovarian endometrioma may change during pregnancy, as described in ultrasound studies of the natural history of endometriosis in pregnancy (Bean E, et al., Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023;62:585-593). Consideration of this dynamic evolution is important when interpreting changed imaging findings in a pregnant patient with known endometrioma.

Frequently asked questions

Why does decidualized endometrioma mimic malignancy?

Due to formation of papillary projections with vascularization within the endometrioma during pregnancy, creating sonographic features suspicious for malignant transformation (Fruscella E, et al.; Mascilini F, et al.).

Can decidualization occur in locations other than the ovaries?

Yes, extragonadal foci have been described, such as polypoid endometriosis of the bladder during pregnancy, mimicking bladder tumor or urachal carcinoma (Lambrechts S, et al.; Chertin B, et al.).

What is the main clinical danger of this pitfall?

Unjustified surgical removal of a benign mass during pregnancy due to falsely suspicious sonographic appearance (Mascilini F, et al., 2014).

Does endometrioma change in appearance during pregnancy?

Yes, the morphology of deep endometriosis and ovarian endometrioma may change throughout pregnancy, as demonstrated by ultrasound studies of the natural history of endometriosis in pregnancy (Bean E, et al., 2023).

The material is intended for specialists and does not replace clinical judgment. Threshold values are periodically reviewed — refer to the current edition of the applicable consensus.
Sources: Mascilini F, Moruzzi C, Giansiracusa C, et al. Imaging in gynecological disease (10): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of decidualized endometriomas surgically removed during pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44(3):354-360. Mascilini F, Savelli L, Scifo MC, et al. Ovarian masses with papillary projections diagnosed and removed during pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;50(1):116-123. Fruscella E, Testa AC, Ferrandina G, et al. Sonographic features of decidualized ovarian endometriosis suspicious for malignancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;24(5):578-580. Bean E, Knez J, Setty T, et al. Natural history of endometriosis in pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023;62:585-593. Lambrechts S, et al. Polypoid endometriosis of the bladder during pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. Chertin B, et al. Pregnancy-induced vesical decidualized endometriosis simulating a bladder tumor. Int Urogynecol J 2007;18:111-112. IDEA group, 2016; ISUOG, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, Vol. 63-64, 2024.
View specialty courses: Obstetrics and Gynecology →
Спросить Alex Отвечу на любой вопрос · 24/7 · на любом языке