Selective FGR in Monochorionic Twins: Gratacós Classification I–III and Surveillance Strategy — МЕДТРЕЙН Asia
Obstetrics and Gynecology

Selective FGR in Monochorionic Twins: Gratacós Classification I–III and Surveillance Strategy

Briefly. Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) in monochorionic twin pregnancy is classified according to the Doppler spectrum pattern in the umbilical artery of the smaller twin (Gratacós, 2007): type I — positive end-diastolic flow, type II — persistent AREDF, type III — cyclical/intermittent AREDF. Management depends on type and gestational age (ISUOG, 2025).

Definition and Classification Basis

Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) in monochorionic pregnancy is classified according to the Gratacós system (Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2007) based on the pattern of blood flow in the umbilical artery of the smaller twin.

Types I–III According to Gratacós (ISUOG, 2025)

TypeDoppler Spectrum in Umbilical Artery of Smaller Twin
Type IPositive end-diastolic flow
Type IIAbsent or reversed end-diastolic flow (AREDF)
Type IIICyclical/intermittent pattern of AREDF (intermittent absent or reversed end-diastolic flow)

Surveillance and Management Strategy

According to ISUOG Practice Guidelines (2025), the evidence base for managing monochorionic twins with sFGR is limited. When there is substantial risk of intrauterine fetal demise of one twin before 26 weeks, selective reduction may be considered (GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION: D).

For type III (intermittent AREDF), fetoscopic laser coagulation of placental anastomoses has been described in the literature as an active management approach (Gratacós et al., Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2008). Specific intervals for dynamic surveillance and threshold gestational ages for delivery by type are not provided in the source fragments — [to be clarified].

Frequently asked questions

By what parameter are types I–III sFGR differentiated?

By the pattern of Doppler spectrum in the umbilical artery of the smaller twin: type I — positive end-diastolic flow, type II — persistent AREDF, type III — cyclical/intermittent AREDF (Gratacós, 2007; ISUOG, 2025).

When is selective reduction considered?

Selective reduction may be considered when there is substantial risk of intrauterine fetal demise of one twin before 26 weeks (GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION: D, ISUOG, 2025).

What method is described for type III?

Fetoscopic laser coagulation of placental anastomoses for intermittent AREDF (type III) with assessment of perinatal outcome (Gratacós et al., Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2008).

How robust is the evidence base for managing sFGR?

According to ISUOG (2025), the evidence for the management of monochorionic twins with sFGR is limited.

The material is intended for specialists and does not replace clinical judgment. Threshold values are periodically reviewed — refer to the current edition of the applicable consensus.
Sources: ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy, ISUOG Clinical Standards Committee, 2025; Gratacós E, Lewi L, et al. A classification system for selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30:28-34; Gratacós E, Antolin E, Lewi L, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31(6):669-675; Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, ISUOG, 2024.
View specialty courses: Obstetrics and Gynecology →
Спросить Alex Отвечу на любой вопрос · 24/7 · на любом языке